Table of Contents
The term sociology was coined by Emmanuel Joseph Sieyes. But this term was popularized and reinvented by August Comte that`s why he is considered as the father of Sociology. Sociological school of Jurisprudence is the branch of jurisprudence which deals with the study of society. The exponents of this school considered law as a social phenomenon. According to this school, the essential characteristic of law should be to represent common interaction of men in social groups, whether past or present, ancient or modern.
The main concern of the jurists of sociological school is to link the law with various other social science disciplines. The supporters of this school of jurisprudence links the law with various social science disciplines. This school of jurisprudence shifts its focus from laissez faire state to the welfare state. Laissez faire state is individual oriented while the Welfare state is socially oriented. The main proponents of this School of jurisprudence are Duguit, Ihering, Ehrlich, Roscoe Pound etc.
LEON DUGUIT
Leon Duguit, a renowned French jurist, made a remarkable impact on the Sociological School of Jurisprudence. Influenced deeply by the ideas of sociologist Émile Durkheim, especially his concept of solidarity, Duguit crafted one of the most influential legal theories in modern times: the Doctrine of Social Solidarity.
🖋️ Famous Works:
Law in the Modern State
The Law and the State
Doctrine of Social Solidarity:
This doctrine can be understood with the help of following points:
- All human activities, organization should be directed to the end of ensuring the smoother and fuller working of men with men. Duguit call it as the principle of Social Solidarity.
- Social solidarity is based on the interdependence of man and is the essence of society.
- Duguit states that law is a rule which men obey not by virtue of any higher principle but because they have to live as members of society.
- According to Duguit, the only right which any man can possess is the right to always do his duty.
- The essence of law is to ensure social solidarity.
CRITICISM
The theory of Leon Duguit is criticized on the following grounds:
1. Ignoring Metaphysical Dimensions- Duguit’s theory completely excludes metaphysical considerations in understanding law. Yet ironically, it seems to rely on an idealistic notion rooted in natural law.
Critics famously remark:
“He pushed natural law out through the door, only to let it come back in through the window.”
2. Confusion Between ‘What Law Is’ and ‘What Law Ought to Be’- His definition blurs the line between law as it exists and law as it should be. According to Duguit, anything that promotes social solidarity is law, which risks turning the legal system into a vague and subjective concept.
3. Neglecting the Role of the State- Duguit largely overlooks the role of the State in the formation and enforcement of laws.
RUDOLPH VON IHERING
Rudolph Von Ihering stands as a key figure in the Sociological School of Jurisprudence. His legal philosophy, famously known as the Jurisprudence of Interests, brought a bold shift toward understanding law as a dynamic force shaped by societal needs.
Famous Works by Ihering:
- Law as means to an End
- The struggle for law
In this theory he mainly pointed out the following things:
- Law emerges from struggle- Ihering believed that law is not static—it is born out of constant societal struggle. Law exists to resolve conflicts between individuals and maintain harmony within society.
- Social Purpose over individual gain- Ihering emphasized that the ultimate goal of law is to serve the larger social good, not merely individual interests.
- Law is one of many social controls– As per Ihering law is not the sole tool that shapes behaviour in society. There are various other factors such as climate, topography, etc.
- Categories of Interest- Ihering defined three categories of interest in his theory which are Individual interest, Social interest and State interest.
EUGEN EHRLICH
Eugen Ehrlich is recognized as a prominent proponent of the Sociological School of Jurisprudence. His influential ideas revolve around the belief that law originates from society, not just from formal state institutions.
Famous work- Fundamental Principles of the sociology of Law
Key principles of Ehrlich`s legal theory are:
- Law springs from social facts- Ehrlich asserted that law is not merely created by the state, but is deeply rooted in social customs, norms, and interactions. It is upheld through social compulsion rather than just legal authority.
- Society is built through association- He emphasized that society is formed by the voluntary association of individuals, and law emerges as a tool to manage this social coexistence.
- Law is society in action- According to Ehrlich, law is not a static document—it is the living activity of society. It adapts as society evolves.
Distinction between two types of law: –Ehrlich’s distinction between two kinds of law is foundational:
Living Law:
The unwritten norms and behaviors that people follow in everyday life.
It is dynamic, flexible, and widely practiced.
Formal Law:
The codified rules enacted by the state and legal institutions.
Often lags behind societal change.
ROSCOE POUND
Roscoe Pound stands out as one of the most influential jurists in legal history. Revered as the father of American Sociological Jurisprudence, he brought a fresh perspective to law by connecting it with society’s real needs.
Famous Works of Roscoe Pound- An introduction to the philosophy of law, Law and morals, The spirit of common law, Social control through law.
Theory of Social engineering:
Pound introduced the groundbreaking Social Engineering Theory, drawing parallels between lawyers and engineers. Just like engineers design bridges or machines, lawyers, according to Pound, design the social structure. The main concepts of this theory are:
1. Law as a Tool for Balance
The aim is to construct a well-ordered society where maximum human wants are satisfied with the minimum use of resources.
2. Three Types of Interests:
Private Interests – Belonging to individuals (e.g., property, contracts).
Public Interests – Interests of the state and its functions.
Social Interests – Interests of society as a whole (e.g., health, safety).
Pound emphasized that law should balance these three interests to ensure justice and harmony.
Jural Postulates of Roscoe Pound:
- No aggression- People must be able to expect that others will not commit intentional harm against them.
- Rightful Control- Individuals should be free to control what they have discovered or lawfully acquired for beneficial use.
- Good faith dealings- In civil society, people must trust that others will act honestly in their dealings.
- Due care- Those engaging in activities must act carefully, avoiding unreasonable risk to others.
- Responsibility for dangerous things- People who maintain risky items or activities must restrain them to prevent harm.
CRITICISM
- Society is not a machine- One of the main criticisms is the metaphorical use of the term “engineering.” Critics argue that comparing society to a factory or mechanical system is overly simplistic. Law is a dynamic social process, not a technical system that can be engineered like machinery.
- Not fit for pluralistic societies- In a diverse and pluralistic society, where people have conflicting beliefs, values, and interests, the idea of engineering a perfectly balanced structure is seen as unrealistic. The critics claim that Social Engineering doesn’t fully accommodate the complexity of human diversity.
References:
- Studies of Legal Theory and Jurisprudence by Dr. N.V. Pranjape
- Jurisprudence and Legal Theory by V.D. Mahajan
